Who we help - Technology & SaaS
Cracked and pirated software, cloned apps, phishing sites impersonating your product, leaked internal data and review attacks on the platforms buyers check - handled as one coordinated engagement instead of five separate fires.
We start with an evidence-led assessment of your exposure - what's removable, what's disputable, and what needs a different response.
Channels we regularly assess
The problems
Tech-sector abuse hits the things buyers and users trust: the product (clones and cracks), the data (leaks), the brand (phishing and impersonation) and the social proof (review attacks). Each has a different enforcement pathway - and they often arrive together.
License-bypassed builds, cracked downloads and key generators distributed through forums, file hosts and torrent aggregators.
Lookalike apps in official and third-party stores, trading on your name to harvest users, data or payments.
Domains impersonating your product's login or checkout - a direct threat to your customers and your security team's week.
Employee records, source snippets or customer data on forums, paste sites and cloud mirrors - with compliance obligations running on a clock.
Coordinated negative-review campaigns on the review and comparison platforms buyers check during evaluation.
Defamation and harassment aimed at named founders and executives - their search results affect fundraising, sales and hiring.
Common scenarios
Typical matters from software companies, SaaS vendors and platforms - each links into a guided assessment.
DMCA enforcement across download sites, forums and file hosts, with search de-indexing so cracked builds stop ranking for your product name.
Start with this situationRegistrar, host and infrastructure channels worked in parallel with search and ad-network reports - prioritised as active user harm.
Start with this situationExposure scanning across forums, paste sites and mirrors; emergency takedowns; monitoring for re-publication - documented for your compliance record.
Start with this situationInauthenticity evidence compiled and platform disputes filed - with honest advice about which reviews qualify and which don't.
Start with this situationApp-store IP complaints with ownership evidence, filed through Apple, Google and third-party store processes.
Start with this situationWhat we can do for you
Tech engagements typically combine IP enforcement for the product with removal and reputation work for the data and the people.
The services behind the work
Platforms & channels
From infrastructure providers to buyer-review platforms - each channel has a distinct reporting pathway, and matters often need several at once.
How it works
Scoped like a security engagement: baseline, triage by user harm, documented enforcement, and reporting your legal and security teams can rely on.
Product, data and brand exposure mapped - cracks, clones, phishing, leaks and review risk - and triaged by active user harm.
One plan across the issue types that matter, with communication and documentation standards agreed with your legal and security teams.
Store complaints, DMCA notices, registrar and infrastructure reports and review disputes - each through the pathway that actually works for that channel.
Continuous detection with timestamped records of every action - usable in compliance reporting and any parallel legal process.
How engagements are structured
Tech companies engage us from a single incident to a standing program:
A single phishing site, clone or review incident - assessed free and quoted as a fixed fee.
Start hereBusiness plans covering piracy, impersonation, reviews and executive protection under one engagement with dashboard reporting.
Start herePlatform-scale programs with negotiated SLAs, API integration into your security tooling and audit trails on every action.
Start hereProof
Representative matters involving data exposure and product enforcement. Details are anonymized; outcomes vary by platform and matter type.
19.4M
URLs removed
URLs removed across search engines, platforms and hosts
98.6%
success rate
on verified, eligible matters - not a universal guarantee
110+
countries
clients served in over 110 countries
Representative matters. Details are anonymized. Outcomes vary by platform, jurisdiction and matter type.
Honest limitations
The honest boundaries, stated up front:
Platforms, hosts and stores decide each complaint; our 98.6% success rate applies to verified, eligible matters, and we confirm eligibility during assessment.
Leaked data that has been widely mirrored can resurface; monitoring manages re-publication continuously rather than promising permanent erasure.
Genuine critical reviews and legitimate commentary about your product aren't removable - disputes succeed on inauthenticity and policy breaches, and we'll tell you which qualify.
We complement your security team's incident response - we handle the public-content workstream, not intrusion investigation or forensics.
FAQ
Yes. Where a domain is being used for brand impersonation, phishing, counterfeiting or confusingly similar trading, we can assess host, registrar, search, payment and formal domain-dispute options. Formal domain recovery depends on evidence and the dispute pathway available.
Tell us what you're seeing - cracks, clones, phishing, leaks or reviews. We'll assess the exposure and propose one coordinated plan, no obligation.
