Who we help - Healthcare
Fabricated reviews, false allegations about care, impersonation of practitioners and clinics, and privacy-sensitive content - removed through evidence-led disputes that respect the confidentiality healthcare demands.
Assessments are confidential and evidence-led - we cross-reference claims against your records before advising what's realistically removable.
Channels we regularly assess
The problems
Healthcare reputation attacks carry unusual weight: a fabricated review alleging poor care can influence patient decisions for years, and practitioners are constrained in how they can publicly respond. Enforcement has to be evidence-led and discreet - which is exactly how we run it.
Reviews alleging treatment failures or misconduct from people who were never patients - on Google, health directories and review platforms.
Claims about qualifications, conduct or outcomes on forums, blogs and social media - ranking for the practitioner's name.
Fake profiles posing as doctors and clinics - soliciting 'consultations', harvesting patient details or selling unregulated products.
Privacy obligations prevent public rebuttals that reveal patient information - removal pathways have to do the work a public reply can't.
Attacks that hit the clinic's listings and the named practitioner's search results at once, needing coordinated cleanup.
Review and social campaigns following employment disputes or fee disagreements - patterned, traceable and often policy-violating.
Common scenarios
Typical matters from clinics, practices and individual practitioners - each links into a confidential assessment.
Claims cross-referenced against appointment and patient records, evidence compiled for policy breaches, and the dispute managed to an outcome - without exposing patient information.
Start with this situationPolicy and defamation-based removal pathways assessed honestly, with de-indexing pursued alongside source removal.
Start with this situationFake profiles and pages reported with registration and identity evidence - prioritised where patients are being actively misled.
Start with this situationOne engagement across the clinic's listings and each named practitioner's search presence, with monitoring for new attacks.
Start with this situationWhat we can do for you
Healthcare engagements centre on reputation, with harmful-content removal for defamation and impersonation matters.
The services behind the work
Platforms & channels
Patients check a small set of surfaces before booking. We run disputes through each platform's specific policy pathway with the right evidence.
How it works
Evidence-led and confidential throughout - built around the privacy constraints healthcare providers actually operate under.
The content reviewed against your records and the relevant platform policies - you'll know what's realistically removable before committing.
Disputes built to demonstrate inauthenticity and policy breaches without disclosing patient information.
Platform disputes, formal notices and de-indexing requests filed and followed through to outcomes.
Monitoring across review platforms and search for the practice and its practitioners, with plain-English reporting.
How engagements are structured
Practices engage us for a single incident or as standing protection:
Proof
Representative matters involving fabricated reviews and defamation. Details are anonymized; outcomes vary by platform and matter type.
19.4M
URLs removed
URLs removed across search engines, platforms and hosts
98.6%
success rate
on verified, eligible matters - not a universal guarantee
110+
countries
clients served in over 110 countries
We were unfairly attacked online by a disgruntled ex-employee. Internet Removals pursued our case with persistence and successfully removed multiple defamatory reviews. We had hit dead ends with Google ourselves, but they achieved results.
They were professional, prompt, and honest. The process was explained thoroughly, communication was excellent, and the negative review was removed quickly. I wouldn't hesitate to recommend them.
Representative matters. Details are anonymized. Outcomes vary by platform, jurisdiction and matter type.
Honest limitations
Stated before engagement, because clinical reputations deserve straight answers:
Genuine patient reviews - even harsh ones - can't be removed for being negative. Disputes succeed on inauthenticity and policy breaches, and we'll tell you which reviews qualify.
Platforms make the final decision on every dispute; our 98.6% success rate applies to verified, eligible matters.
We are not a law firm and don't advise on medical-negligence or regulatory matters - where legal strategy is needed, we prepare evidence and coordinate with your counsel.
Legitimate news coverage of regulatory findings is rarely removable; where it isn't, we'll say so and focus on what's actually actionable.
FAQ
Frequently, yes. Inauthentic and policy-violating reviews can be disputed through Google, Trustpilot, Yelp and industry platforms. We compile the evidence of inauthenticity and manage the dispute to an outcome, though platforms make the final call, which is why we assess before you commit.
Tell us what's been posted, confidentially. We'll assess it against platform policy and your records, and tell you honestly what can be removed.
